Proceedings on Child Custody Agreement:
If you wish to proceed with the child custody agreement by family lawyer in Lahore Pakistan, you may contact Jamila Law Associates. Family court Act, 1964 held, provided for one appeal for child custody agreement by family lawyer in Lahore Pakistan against decision or decree passed by the family court and made certain decrees non-appeal able application of civil procedure code to proceeding under family court Act, 1964, held, was barred except Ss.10 & 11 of the code.
Family Court:
The order passed under Act by Family Court presided over by a Civil Judge or by the appellate court presided over District Judge Held cannot be revised under S. 115, C.P.C Rigours of proving documents did not apply to the proceedings before the Family Court. Nikahnama produced by the plaintiff remained un-rebutted by the defendant, which the Appellate Court could not ignore. The findings of the Appellate Court about the refusal of maintenance were incorrect.
Dower:
Dower was fifteen tolas of gold, out of which four tolas were prompt while remaining was deferred. Plaintiff had acknowledged receipt of three tolas of gold, but she was entitled to twelve tolas of gold as dower. It partially accepted a constitutional petition. Exclusion of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 envisaged in section 17 of Family Courts Act, 1964 for child custody agreement by family lawyer in Lahore Pakistan does not apply to the execution proceedings. Execution proceedings shall be regulated and proceeded with through O. XXI, C.P.C.
Family Lawyer in Lahore Pakistan:
Exclusion for child custody agreement by family lawyer in Lahore Pakistan is only meant for matters regarding the Part I of the Schedule of Family Courts Act, 1964.” Section 17 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 provided that Civil Procedure Code, 1908 and Qanun–e-Shahadat, 1984, did not apply to the proceedings in the Family Court, and it had been left with the Judge Family Court to determine. Its procedure while allowing parties to suits to produce evidence held, under S.17, West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, no provision of C.P.C. except Ss. 10 & 11 applied to the proceedings before the Family Court.
Provision:
Such provisions are not sent applicable to proceedings before Family Court for child custody agreement by family lawyer in Lahore Pakistan. The period of past maintenance claimed in the first suit was six years, while the second/present suit was five years. Family Court had not decided the first suit on merits, rather had rejected plaint on the technical or preliminary ground for want of jurisdiction. Res judicata would not apply where it did not decide the first suit on merits. Family Court had exclusive jurisdiction to entertain all maintenance claims without exception and had no jurisdiction to exclude the maintenance claim against her father.
Order of Family Court:
Order of Family Court rejecting objection in the first suit for being void order was liable to be ignored. Such a plea of the father was overruled in the circumstances of child custody agreement by family lawyer in Lahore Pakistan. Family Court on its own had not appointed Referee but had appointed him on express consent, and desire of both parties have agreed to abide by his decision.
