Petition for Child Custody on Birthday Parties:
If you wish to file a petition for child custody on birthday parties through family lawyer in Pakistan, you may contact Jamila Law Associates. Constitutional petition against an order for interim maintenance was not maintainable unless it was Coram non judicial or based on mala fide for child custody on birthday parties through family lawyer in Pakistan. Most of the Females not know that How to Deal the Child custody case in Pakistan? For Child Custody in Pakistan, U need to Hire the Top Family Lawyer in Pakistan. The Process of Child custody in Pakistan after divorce & Child custody after khula in Pakistan is little different. Now Get the Free Guide On Child custody law in Pakistan by Female Lawyer.
Quantum of interim:
Quantum of interim maintenance could not be made a ground for invoking constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court. S14 (3) of Family Courts Act, 1964 did bar appeal or revision against an interim order passed by the Family Court. The aggrieved party could agitate his grievance before the appellate forum to merge the interim order into a final order. The constitutional petition was dismissed in limine, in the circumstances.
Petitioner:
Petitioner was the husband of the respondent and was aggrieved of the order passed by Family Court to provide interim maintenance allowance to the respondent for their minor suckling baby after divorce for child custody on birthday parties through family lawyer in Pakistan. The concept of Razayat and Hazanat were well established, and every child had the following rights over its parents: Right of razayat or being suckled Right of fosterage and being brought up Right of being trained and educated High Court declined to interfere in constitutional jurisdiction as Family Court had rightly included interim maintenance for divorced mother of minor as the order passed by Family Court was only tentative in nature and amount of maintenance would finally be decided after the recording of evidence for child custody on birthday parties through family lawyer in Pakistan. The constitutional petition was dismissed in the circumstances.
Family Lawyer in Pakistan:
Family Court for child custody on birthday parties through family lawyer in Pakistan had stuck off the husband’s right to file a written statement contrary to the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964. No provision for striking off the right of file written statement existed in the Act. Statutory right to strike off the defendant’s defense was only available under S. 17-A of the Act, which was for interim maintenance. If the husband failed to file a written statement by order of the Family Court, the Family Court might strike off his defense; and the case would then proceed in Evidence and terms of S. 11 of the Act, the wife would lead evidence on child custody on birthday parties through family lawyer in Pakistan.
recording evidence:
When recording evidence, the husband had not filed his written statement and had a right to cross-examine the wife’s witnesses. Such right was a valuable right and was prescribed in S. 11(3) of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964. In the present case, Family Court could strike off the husband’s right to file a written statement, right of defense, but could not close his right to cross-examine the wife’s witnesses for child custody on birthday parties through family lawyer in Pakistan.
Denial of said right would render the procedure adopted by the Family Court unfair and against the right to a fair trial. High Court set aside impugned orders and remanded the case to Family Court to provide one more opportunity to the husband to file a written statement and procedure evidence.
