Nikahnama Signatures in Court Marriage:
If you need assistance in nikahnama signatures on court marriage in Lahore Pakistan, you may contact Jamila Law Associates. The constitutional petition does not lie against an interim order as under section 14(3) of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964; no appeal or revision is competing against a temporary charge of the Family Court for nikahnama signatures on court marriage in Lahore Pakistan. When the legislature has expressly prohibited the filing of appeal or revision against an interim order, filing a constitutional petition against such an order would amount to defeating and diverting the legislature’s intent.
Constitutional Petition:
The constitutional petition would not be maintainable as an alternate remedy of filing an appeal in terms of S. 14(1)(b) of West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, is available with the Petitioner. Wife filed suit for recovery of maintenance allowance wherein an application for fixation of interim maintenance was moved, which was accepted by the Family Court. Family Court could pass temporary order about care, writ petition dismissed on nikahnama signatures on court marriage in Lahore Pakistan.
Constitutional Jurisdiction of the High Court is entirely discretionary which can be declined in appropriate cases. While exercising constitutional Jurisdiction, High Court has to see. High Court, in such cases, cannot embark upon a reappraisal of evidence as it is the job of the appellate Court. Petitioner lived with respondent as her wife for more than five years, and during that period, she had been using her dowry articles; it would not be fair to order the respondent to pay R.S. 20,000 for the use of dowry article after nikahnama signatures on court marriage in Lahore Pakistan.
Court Marriage in Lahore Pakistan:
For nikahnama signatures on court marriage in Lahore Pakistan where there is jurisdiction to decide, there is jurisdiction to settle either rightly or wrongly, and mere a wrong decision does not render the decision without jurisdiction. O amount to a nullity, an act must be non-existent in the eye of the law, that is to say, it must be wholly without jurisdiction or performed in such a way that the law regards it as a mere colorable exercise Jurisdiction or unlawful usurpation of jurisdiction on nikahnama signatures on court marriage in Lahore Pakistan. Accordingly, an order of the Family Court cannot be considered as without lawful authority even if it is erroneous and based on evidence on the record a contrary decision could have been arrived at.”
Marriage Dissolved:
The marriage dissolved in the exercise of the right of option of puberty by Family Court, District Judge, setting aside the order. Order of District Judge without lawful authority and suffering from jurisdictional defect declared to be no legal consequences by High Court.5 Family Court had jurisdiction to pass interim maintenance orders at any stage of the proceedings in a suit for maintenance after nikahnama signatures on court marriage in Lahore Pakistan. Interim maintenance fixed by the Family Court was too meager. The defendant had not made bona fide demand for the custody of his minor children. Fathers of little children could not expect their mother to keep them and pay all their expenses.
