Federal Courts and Female Advocates in Pakistan:
The Federal Shariat Court runs as a parallel judiciary, but there are no female advocates in Pakistan. Its decisions are binding on the High Courts. In addition, it has original jurisdiction to declare any law repugnant to Islam (except the Constitution, personal laws, and procedural laws regulating courts or tribunals). It may also examine any law on its initiative. Our Female Advocate in Lahore & Advocate in Lahore Pakistan is Best & Top As compare to the Other Females Advocates in Lahore
Federal Shariat Court:
When it declares a law repugnant to Islam, the Federal Shariat Court lays down the reasons for its repugnancy. It fixes the time frame within which it should be repealed or the indicated change in it should be legislated. The Constitution requires the President of Pakistan to change the law to bring it according to injunctions of Islam. The Parliament is thus bound by the reasons given by the Federal Shariat Court to replace a law on the lines of the latter’s reasoning. The Federal Shariat Court has decided many issues concerning women’s rights without the representation of female advocates in Pakistan. With time, such matters will increase.
Moreover, gender issues are sensitive. They must be thoroughly debated before any legislative steps can be taken. Therefore, as far as possible, legislation on such matters should be discussed thoroughly before any change is brought about. The superior courts of Pakistan regularly interpret 1slamic law. In pursuance of the requirement to bring all laws in conformity with Islam (Article 227 of the Constitution), where necessary, they cook waves to harmonize the spirit of the Constitution with the principles of Islam. As such, a separate judicial forum with the same responsibility is not necessary. Recommendations of female advocates in Pakistan: Chapter 34 of the Constitution be repealed Eighth Amendment. The Eighth Amendment to the Constitution, forced on the just-elected National Assembly of 1985 on pain of continuance of martial law, validated all the rules and constitutional amendments which have earlier been made by the military government without any public debate.
The democratic process thus became hostage to these amendments. One of these, 58(2) b, had caused the premature tall to tour elected governments. The present government promptly and solitarily repealed it soon after it came to power. However, several other provisions which are in their consequences still exist. These include the Articles, which were amended to introduce a separate electorate system. The Constitution was revived in 1985 after eight years of suspension, during which twenty-five amendments have been made to it. This had meant the revision of 61 Articles and the addition of 20 new ones. Amongst these, the amendments to Articles 51 and 106 had changed the method of elections of non-Muslims. This was the first time the system of separate elections was introduced in Pakistan.
It had made only Muslim candidates eligible to contest elections from the general seats candidates were reserved according to their population without any female advocates in Pakistan. They were to be elected by members of their religious community – their constituencies being the entire country for candidates to the National Assembly and the concerned provinces for candidates to the Provincial Assembly. The system continues in operation. Non-Muslim women who are already handicapped are further discouraged from contesting elections. Even as voters, they are far removed from their candidates and often have to make a blind choice.
Click For More Details: www.familycaselawyer.com